To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.cad.devOpen lugnet.cad.dev in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 CAD / Development / 4406
  Subparts for Black Falcon and Wolfpack Patterns ?
 
When I fix the bowties in the Black Falcon and Wolfpack shields (this weekend), would it be more sensible to make each pattern a subpart (or two), which could be shared between shields, torsos and flags, scaled appropriately? If I had done this to (...) (24 years ago, 7-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  Re: Subparts for Black Falcon and Wolfpack Patterns ?
 
(...) That sounds like a reasonably good idea. :) Steve -- Reduce, reuse, recycle ... bits (24 years ago, 8-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  Re: Subparts for Black Falcon and Wolfpack Patterns ?
 
(...) weekend), (...) could (...) I am proposing an alternative way of handling the castle logos which are common to the shields, torsos and flags. I have put the logos into subparts. It also seems to make sense to synchronise the Pxx number across (...) (24 years ago, 8-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  Re: Subparts for Black Falcon and Wolfpack Patterns ?
 
(...) I would prefer that you do that, because you can get the sizes right. I just used 0.5x for the scaling on the shields. (24 years ago, 9-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  Re: Subparts for Black Falcon and Wolfpack Patterns ?
 
(...) Let me rephrase that... I just make the design from the shields 50% smaller. (24 years ago, 9-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  Re: Subparts for Black Falcon and Wolfpack Patterns ?
 
(...) errors. (...) common (...) these (...) let (...) Having now looked in more detail at the torsos, I will probably modify this proposal. On the torsos the _shield_ is a very different shape and scale to the shield part. The actual wolf and black (...) (24 years ago, 19-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  Re: Subparts for Black Falcon and Wolfpack Patterns ?
 
(...) So this means that even if I had redone the torsos then they would have been wrong? (...) AFAIK yes. (24 years ago, 19-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR