|
|
 | | Re: Some Words To BFC
|
| (...) Good point. We definitely *should* muddy this discussion up with some real facts. ;) (...) Yes and no. Something that's easy to do is definitely less of a 'requirement' than something that's a lot of work. But it's still a requirement, placed (...) (25 years ago, 6-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | | | Re: Some Words To BFC
|
| Steve Bliss <blisses@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message news:4qbnescr7hii5bq...4ax.com... (...) I hope it doesn't cause indigestion :-) -John Van (25 years ago, 5-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | | | Re: Some Words To BFC
|
| Steve Bliss <blisses@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message news:v96neskqugbi18b...4ax.com... (...) use to (...) object (it (...) faces (...) choose (...) in some (...) required to (...) the (...) You make a very good point here, Steve (especially (...) (25 years ago, 5-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | | | Re: Some Words To BFC
|
| I need to digest this. I'll respond tomorrow. Steve (...) (25 years ago, 5-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | | | Re: Performance Improvement
|
| Rui, I think that it's better to keep the 4-4disc and 2-4disc files the way they are. The current configuration is more flexible, requires fewer special-size primitives, and is less likely to be mis-applied. The new proposal would only provide a (...) (25 years ago, 5-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
|
