To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.cad.devOpen lugnet.cad.dev in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 CAD / Development / 4194
4193  |  4195
Subject: 
Re: More MPD
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.cad.dev
Date: 
Wed, 22 Mar 2000 16:29:58 GMT
Viewed: 
3511 times
  
I think this goes back to the discussion (from last week, I think) about
the MPD format, and if it does everything needed, and if there should be
changes to it, or a new file format.  To handle nested files, and
sub-mpd files, I'd go for a new format.

This hypothetical format would be targeted to containing single models
made of multiple nested components.  The sub-components within a file
would be private to that file.  A model could also be made of several
multi-component files working together.

In lugnet.cad.dev, Lars C. Hassing wrote:

> 1. Are the files in an MPD public or private?

I don't *know* for sure, but I'd be willing to wager a small amount of
money that they aren't.

If someone develops a new file-spec, add an option so an multi-component
file could be referenced as either public or private, to allow libraries
of files to be developed.

> 2. I suggest BuildMpd and M-Peedy should be able to handle MPD's too
> as input files, and SplitMPD and M-Peedy should be able to split an MPD
> correctly into the original files, both MPD and DAT.

Do you mean, the builders should be able to stuff an MPD into another
MPD?  This would definitely require a spec-change, either an endofdat
delimiter, or a file.subfile notation on the 0 FILE command.

> 3. Can I generally use the NOFILE meta command to skip the rest of the file,
> i.e. also for ordinary DAT files?

No.  Well, you could use it, but I'd expect programs would either ignore
it, or report a syntax error.

> Should it be renamed to EOF/ENDOFFILE?

I'd prefer 0 FILE END, to match LDLite syntax for nested commands.
Which would mean we couldn't empeedy a file named END., but I think
that's a minor inconvenience.

Steve



Message is in Reply To:
  More MPD  [DAT]
 
1. Are the files in an MPD public or private? Consider this example with three files: town.dat 1 16 -40 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 house1.mpd 1 16 40 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 house2.mpd house1.mpd 0 FILE house1.dat 1 4 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 3003.DAT 1 4 0 (...) (27 years ago, 22-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)

4 Messages in This Thread:



Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR