 | | Re: Modeling without the real element -- bad —Roy Earls
|
| | | Todd Lehman wrote in message ... (...) without (...) to (...) Whoa, big boy. Calling someone careless when they are doing the best they can is pretty ... oh how did you put it... ah, yes... anal-retentive. Shall that be "mother's milk" or "milk of (...) (25 years ago, 26-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Modeling without the real element -- bad —Jonathan Wilson
|
| | | | | all my parts are designed to be usable. if they are out by a large amount or are unusable then i will fix it. (25 years ago, 26-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Modeling without the real element -- bad —Jasper Janssen
|
| | | | | | (...) Jonathan, I don't really want to get into the parts stuff, but could you possibly use proper capitalisation in your posts? Your posts are hard on the eyes, and that really isn't necessary. Thank you. Jasper (25 years ago, 27-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Modeling without the real element -- bad —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | | (...) OK, fair enough. But I submit that someone who is modeling an element blind (without an actual copy of it to work from) is *not* doing the best they can. (...) OK, I probably shouldn't talk then. I haven't modeled any parts myself. :-/ --Todd (25 years ago, 27-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Modeling without the real element -- bad —Paul Gyugyi
|
| | | | Any Saturday Night Live fans out there? "Welcome to the, how do you say? Ah Yes, Anal Retentive Show, and I am your host Antonio Baldaraz." "See senior, you are the anal one, my friend, har ahr" <guitar> 'Is something misaligned in here?" "Oh no! (...) (25 years ago, 2-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | |
