Subject:
|
Re: Is the LDraw parts database free?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Fri, 19 Nov 1999 16:23:10 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
928 times
|
| |
|
|
Steve:
> So do we want to clearly delineate what people can, and cannot, do with the
> parts library? Or is it better to leave it fuzzy?
It is preferable that it is clear what can and can not be
done with the library. Otherwise people will come and ask us
"all the time".
> If people have to ask permission before doing certain actions (such as
> translating and/or redistributing), who do they ask? Who can give
> permission?
People shouldn't have to ask for permission to do anything
we can agree it is reasonable to let them do.
The answer to questions we can't agree about will have to be
no (sort of), so that shouldn't cause too many difficulties.
Play well,
Jacob
------------------------------------------------
-- E-mail: sparre@cats.nbi.dk --
-- Web...: <URL:http://www.ldraw.org/FAQ/> --
------------------------------------------------
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Is the LDraw parts database free?
|
| * Jacob Sparre Andersen (sparre@sys-323.risoe.dk) [991119 10:29]: (...) Even worse; Giving a part to the part-library gives up certain rights to the part. If it isn't clear what rights exist, then people may not make parts for the part-library. I (...) (25 years ago, 19-Nov-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Is the LDraw parts database free?
|
| (...) So do we want to clearly delineate what people can, and cannot, do with the parts library? Or is it better to leave it fuzzy? If people have to ask permission before doing certain actions (such as translating and/or redistributing), who do (...) (25 years ago, 18-Nov-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
28 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
