Subject:
|
Re: Several replies to CLIPPING / WINDING
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Wed, 20 Oct 1999 13:31:52 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
594 times
|
| |
|
|
On Wed, 20 Oct 1999 10:36:25 GMT, Rui Martins <Rui.Martins@link.pt> wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Oct 1999, Lars C. Hassing wrote:
>
> > Would you require an unbroken chain of certified DAT files?
>
> NO,
> Every file is a closed unit, anynone can be certified or not, and you
> can mix them (in a chain), that each one will be drawn/optimized for
> itself, no dependent on previous files (in the chain).
That's not true. If a super-file is not certified, then there's no way to
tell if the subfile is normal or inverted. So when a file is referenced by
a non-certified super-file, it can't be clipped, even if the referenced
file is certified.
Steve
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Several replies to CLIPPING / WINDING
|
| (...) This is a problem of the current design (the one beeing used now). You didn't knew in the past, because you didn't have the 0 INVERT meta-command. So you can only assume it' NOT inverted. If for some reason, it is inverted, then the old .DAT (...) (25 years ago, 20-Oct-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Several replies to CLIPPING / WINDING
|
| (...) By candidate, I meant, someone could optiomize it, a place a 0 CLIPPING ON meta-command on it, and get some benefit. If you use enable clipping, but you have no graphic primitives in your file (assuming clipping is stryctly local), than you (...) (25 years ago, 20-Oct-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
15 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
