To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.cad.devOpen lugnet.cad.dev in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 CAD / Development / 2716
2715  |  2717
Subject: 
Re: i admit i was wrong
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.admin.general
Followup-To: 
lugnet.admin.general
Date: 
Tue, 17 Aug 1999 21:58:17 GMT
Viewed: 
1124 times
  
In lugnet.cad.dev, Tim Courtney <tim@zacktron.com> writes:

About these voting options, the votes for a more severe restriction should
carry over to a less severe restriction if that particular restriction
recieves the 2/3 majority votes.  For example:

25% vote for removal from lugnet.*
50% vote for removal from lugnet.cad.*
25% vote not to remove JW's privileges at all

Now this is an oversimplification of the case, but this is to prove a point
and kill a headache on my part by making things a little mroe realistic :)

The votes for lugnet.* would be counted as votes for lugnet.cad.* since
cad.* is included under lugnet.* and lugnet.cad.* received more
votes.  This would push the votes for lugnet.cad.* to 75%, thus exceeding
the 2/3 majority requirement.

That doesn't follow.  The choices aren't mutually exclusive, are they?  I
thought these were separate, independently voted-upon percentages.  If so,
then they can't be combined mathematically as described above.  Consider:

If you had

   95% vote for removal from lugnet.*
   98% vote for removal from lugnet.cad.*
   2% vote not to remove JW's privileges at all

would you say that pushed the votes for lugnet.cad.* to 193%?

With sets and subsets, the only way they could be considered combinable is
via the 'maximum' function:

   F(x,y) = x if x >= y
          = y if x <= y

So if you had

   55% vote for removal from lugnet.*
   60% vote for removal from lugnet.cad.*

then the effect of the upper portion on the lower portion is zero.  If you
had

   60% vote for removal from lugnet.*
   55% vote for removal from lugnet.cad.*

then the effect of the upper portion on the lower portion is to raise it an
additional 5% to 60% by proper subset inclusion.

--Todd

[followups to lugnet.admin.general]



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: i admit i was wrong
 
(...) About these voting options, the votes for a more severe restriction should carry over to a less severe restriction if that particular restriction recieves the 2/3 majority votes. For example: 25% vote for removal from lugnet.* 50% vote for (...) (25 years ago, 16-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.admin.general)

146 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR