To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.cad.devOpen lugnet.cad.dev in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 CAD / Development / 2715
2714  |  2716
Subject: 
Once again, please move this discussion to lugnet.admin.general (was: CFV: Jonathan Wilson's posting privileges on LUGNET)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.starwars
Followup-To: 
lugnet.admin.general
Date: 
Tue, 17 Aug 1999 21:31:39 GMT
Viewed: 
76 times
  
In lugnet.admin.general, lehman@javanet.com (Todd Lehman) writes:

This is a Call For Votes (CFV)

After much discussion it has been decided that an open public vote needs to
be made about this situation.  The vote is at the end of this message.
Please read the Problem Summary and Defense before voting.
[...]

The above message should have been posted with the 'Followup-To' header set
to a lugnet.admin.general.  (But don't get mad at Adam; he made an honest
mistake.)

Please do *not* reply to messages on this thread without changing the
newsgroup header to lugnet.admin.general if it's not already set to that.

In other words, if you post a reply, please do not clog the other groups
(especially .starwars) with more discussion of this -- it's too off-topic
for any group except .admin.general -- thanks...

Once again, please do ***NOT*** reply to any message on this thread without
making sure that you are posting a reply to lugnet.admin.general *ONLY*.

It was an *accident* when Adam posted the original CFV message that the
Followup-To field was not set to lugnet.admin.general -- the discussion
should not be spread across 4 different groups.

Please do *NOT* continue to clog the other groups (especially .starwars)
with more discussion of this -- it's too off-topic for any group except
admin.general.

Thanks!

--Todd



Message is in Reply To:
  Please move this discussion to lugnet.admin.general (was: CFV: Jonathan Wilson's posting privileges on LUGNET)
 
(...) Oops! Adam, the 'Followup-To' header needs to be part of the message header, not the body of the message. (...) The above message should have been posted with the 'Followup-To' header set to a lugnet.admin.general. (But don't get mad at Adam; (...) (25 years ago, 17-Aug-99, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.starwars)

101 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR