 | | Re: Lossless outlining (Was: [ldraw.org] Progress)
|
|
(...) Agreed completely. For serious file-sharing, MPD is way better than inlining. Steve (25 years ago, 14-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Question about part 4081
|
|
(...) I don't know if they have different part numbers, but they should be two seperate parts. The old (thin) one had many uses that the current one doesn't. Example: If you put a tile on the clip, it would line up perfectly with the side of the (...) (25 years ago, 14-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Lossless outlining (Was: [ldraw.org] Progress)
|
|
Steve Bliss wrote in message <375bc53d.299725817@...et.com>... (...) In which case MPD would be better anyway. (...) (25 years ago, 14-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: LDAO Suggestion
|
|
(...) Umm, what's the difference between the appearance of organization and actual organization (assuming one is taking more than a superficial look at what's going on)? Anyway, style folders would actually organize stuff. But not necessarily by (...) (25 years ago, 14-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: IMPORTANT - [ldraw.org] Official Model Repository
|
|
(...) Would that be an important feature? I have thought about making the editor and modeler smart enough to strip off the header from files, before displaying the file for editing. But I figured it wouldn't be a big enough deal to bother working (...) (25 years ago, 14-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
