 | | Re: Any hope for LDLite and MPD together?
|
|
Steve Bliss wrote in message <36cc614e.2128629@lu...et.com>... (...) was (...) Why not Mac users? If LDLite was on the LUGNET server, it could just send the output as a .gif file or such. It would be slower, of course, but wouldn't require a local (...) (26 years ago, 18-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Any hope for LDLite and MPD together?
|
|
(...) Except Mac users... Steve (26 years ago, 18-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Any hope for LDLite and MPD together?
|
|
Paul, do you have plans to make LDLite compatable with the MPD format? I was reminded of this by the tyre posts to lugnet.cad. I think this would be a major improvement as far as the usefulness of lugnet.cad.dat. Of course the other major (...) (26 years ago, 18-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | [makelist] - Re: mklist v1.0 ready for testing
|
|
Hello Lars, I've been able to run mklist.exe on my MS-DOS 6.2 based machine at home, and also on a Windows NT 4.00 based machine at work. Your program works fine on both of them. If you are able to make it sub-sort the identical descriptions on (...) (26 years ago, 18-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Parts Maintenance Idea
|
|
(...) I can speak on this. Japan uses either y-d-m or d-m-y in modern forms. Traditionally (and still in some traditional circles) the Year is expressed in reference to the current ruling emperor, so the year that I was there (1996) was actually (...) (26 years ago, 18-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Parts Maintenance Idea
|
|
Benoit: (...) I have always believed that Japan uses a year-month-day date format. Are you sure? Play well, Jacob ---...--- -- E-mail: sparre@nbi.dk -- -- Web...: <URL:(URL) -- ---...--- LDraw FAQ: <URL:(URL) (26 years ago, 18-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: castle parts
|
|
i mean the one used in knights castle where the face grille can't be moved. it has a single plume in the top. and vertical bars over the face area. (26 years ago, 18-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Parts Maintenance Idea
|
|
(...) Here, XXXX was to represent 6645 <blush>. (...) (26 years ago, 18-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: castle parts
|
|
Yes, the spear should be in the next vote. The arrow quiver is in my to do bag, but it's not top priority. -John Van Chris Dee wrote in message ... (...) (26 years ago, 17-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Parts Maintenance Idea
|
|
(...) In lugnet.cad.dev, chris_w_dee@hotmail.com (Chris Dee) writes: (...) They are quite different. I didn't know that both had the same number, though. CHRIS: Are you certain that the housing from set XXXX has 2578 molded into it? The original, (...) (26 years ago, 17-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
