 | | Re: Voting page 9905
|
|
(...) vote early and often. ;) (...) Note to Karim: the reason your name is on 1-4con10.dat is because I had thrown that file together on my system awhile ago, but then I got confused about which files you had posted, and I was trying to be sure you (...) (25 years ago, 26-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Discussion-Large Technic Shock 2909c01.dat
|
|
On Wed, 26 May 1999 06:18:52 GMT, legoverse@geocities.com (Terry K) wrote: [snip] (...) Hmm. Did you mean 'skoash' or 'skoosh'? Seriously, it sounds fine to me. Steve (25 years ago, 26-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | RE: what has happened to these parts?
|
|
(...) my brick 1 x 2 with ferry windows pattern was very similar to 3004p06.dat brick 1 x 2 with black grille pattern. however the p06 used rect.dat which gave a 24 colored edge around the black stripes. also my ferry windows stripes were more (...) (25 years ago, 26-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | what has happened to these parts?
|
|
why have these parts not been released for voting yet? the technic flexable hoses brick 1 x 2 with ferry windows pattern slope brick 18 4 x 2 slope brick 65 6 x 6 x 2 quad inverted with cutouts shock absorber 1 x 2 x 2 (25 years ago, 26-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Making new (Star Wars) parts
|
|
(...) I migth have a go at this piece, it has number 30360 embossed in it. But I'm not starting right now. And although I'm aware that most of you are desparately in need for this part, I strongly believe that this part needs some of the new (...) (25 years ago, 26-May-99, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | How do you know the numbers?
|
|
I'm a bit puzzled. How do you guys know that the Technic Axle #5 has number 32073 (off my memory) and that the Technic Connector with Axlehole has number 32039? As far as I can see, these numbers are not printed on the parts. Do you have a spy (...) (25 years ago, 26-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Voting page 9905
|
|
Padewans, Voting for update 9905 commences: (URL) that 4 unapproved primitives are include for the cone 3x3x2 piece. (The 3x3x2 cone! Finally! I've been doing that Jedi mind-control hand movement in Steve's direction for *months* - guess it finally (...) (25 years ago, 26-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Proposed primitive for notched round surface
|
|
Sorry Taskforce, I've made a crucial typing error in my answer to a mail from Lars yesterday. In the second part of the answer to his question: (...) "I believe that in this case a 1-4cyli primitive rotated over 45 degrees covers the inner wall (...) (25 years ago, 26-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Update 9904 released
|
|
(...) The "best" orientation for many parts is debatable, and usually easy enough to change when modelling. Especially on baseplates. -- Terry K -- (25 years ago, 26-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Discussion-Large Technic Shock 2909c01.dat
|
|
(...) Yes, the consensus. That is the tough part. I do think that, whichever way we decide to go, that the cross-section should have a little more roundness to it. The output in POV-Ray is proof of that. OK people, how about this: Manfreds (...) (25 years ago, 26-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
