 | | Re: Voting Page —Terry Keller
|
| | | (...) Good point. An alternate idea would be to rotate it 90 degrees in the Y-plane. That would place its default position in perfect alignment with all the axles default positions. What does everyone think? Leave it as-is? Lay it down flat? Rotate (...) (26 years ago, 10-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Voting Page —Fredrik Glöckner
|
| | | | (...) But this kind of thing isn't done for other parts, is it? Take the bushes, wheels, gear cogs and so on; they must all be rotated to fit the axles. (...) We could just argue that the cam is essentially a pulley/wheel kind of part, rather than a (...) (26 years ago, 10-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Voting Page —Jeff Boen
|
| | | | (...) cinderella, cinderella, all i ever hear is cinderella... hehehhee. just kidding... FG addressed this to me personally when i presented the part... and i agree with him that this is important (especially since i was the one who started all the (...) (26 years ago, 10-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Voting Page —Fredrik Glöckner
|
| | | | (...) Of course, with this background, the Technic Cam already has a proper orientation. Fredrik (26 years ago, 11-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | |
