 | | Re: [ldraw.org] L3P Question
|
|
(...) Two comments here. It might not be too good an idea to go high profile with the use of the word "LEGO" in the site. James did not name the program "legodraw", and for a good reason. Starting up a slick websight presence as ldraw.org, and then (...) (26 years ago, 14-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: [ldraw.org] Domain Registration
|
|
(...) Ok, read the article. I agree, its a good time to wait. However, this all depends on the completion timeframe for ldraw.org versus how the government is on its latest venture sticking its hand into free enterprise. (not so upset here though, (...) (26 years ago, 14-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Charter for newsgroup for ldraw.org
|
|
(...) Excellent! :) (...) Most decidedly A. Keep Building!! -Tim <>< (URL) timcourtne ICQ: 23951114 You've seen their sites and read their posts, now see their faces: RTL/LUGNET Legofest 1999: (URL) SP++++c(6973)[ip++++ bt2++++ ex+++ ft+++ sp+++ (...) (26 years ago, 14-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Foundations (Was: [ldraw.org] Eve of Beginnings)
|
|
(...) Ohh...wait :) I was going to keep 'The LDraw Foundation' capatilzed that way, yes. Oops :) Um, my comment on that was if the site was called ldraw.org, it would be either all uppercase or all lowercase. Sorry about the confusion. (...) Hmmm... (...) (26 years ago, 14-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Dat posting idea for users of Agent
|
|
(...) Arghh! You mean to undermine my perverse, er, clever idea! Yeah, I guess if it would make everything works smoother, that would be OK. But you could still reply to cad.dat posts from a newsreader, right? Cause I don't really care for using the (...) (26 years ago, 14-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
