 | | Re: Dat posting idea for users of Agent —Todd Lehman
|
| | | (...) I guess it would work for any newsreader that doesn't allow a newsgroup- by-newsgroup line-length setting and does allow multiple installations. (...) Pretty slick, yup. :-) But pretty perverse too. :-) I was thinking of at some point (after I (...) (26 years ago, 13-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Dat posting idea for users of Agent —John VanZwieten
|
| | | | | Todd Lehman wrote in message ... <snip> (...) This would be quite inconvenient, especially for times when web access is limited. -John Van (26 years ago, 13-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Dat posting idea for users of Agent —Jeremy H. Sproat
|
| | | | | | (...) I agree. Perhaps this is one spot where MIME attachments make sense. Cheers, - jsproat (26 years ago, 14-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Dat posting idea for users of Agent —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | | | (...) Good idea, yes! If not in the storage, at least in the acceptance of the messages. --Todd (26 years ago, 14-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Dat posting idea for users of Agent —Terry Keller
|
| | | | (...) Arghh! You mean to undermine my perverse, er, clever idea! Yeah, I guess if it would make everything works smoother, that would be OK. But you could still reply to cad.dat posts from a newsreader, right? Cause I don't really care for using the (...) (26 years ago, 14-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Dat posting idea for users of Agent —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | (...) Yea, fer sure. The only reason would be to standardize/correct posting problems. --Todd (26 years ago, 14-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | |
