Subject:
|
Possible (minor) contradiction in the specs
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Thu, 3 Jun 2010 22:21:47 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
32023 times
|
| |
|
|
Hi all,
Not sure if this is the correct group for this, but I was wondering about a
possible contradiction in the specs.
I started working on a translation of my LD4DStudio renderer in C++ in means of
a refresher course. While starting this up I decided to try and create a ldraw
file loading implementation as close to the standard as possible.
So while setting up the comment / meta handling stuff I read in the 1.0.0 specs
comments are preferred to start with "0 //" (old way depreciated), But when
gathering all meta line keywords I noticed the extension documents are using
comments without the // all the time.
Just something I noticed.
Greetings,
Roland
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Possible (minor) contradiction in the specs
|
| (...) If by "extension documents" you mean the (sub-)specifications referred to from the main 1.0.0 spec document (ie this page (URL) is no contradiction as the referenced specs were ratified BEFORE the main 1.0.0 spec (they had to be, otherwise the (...) (14 years ago, 4-Jun-10, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
2 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
