Subject:
|
Re: LETGUI new version 0.1.0.14
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Fri, 8 Aug 2008 08:45:05 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
10425 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev, Anders Isaksson wrote:
> Tore Eriksson wrote:
>
> > I'm sorry, I now recall one thing about LDS that makes it complicated
> > to just implicate in a generic shell program. It outputs error codes,
> > that's one if the main reasons I asked Anders to create a tailor made
> > shell program to it. And I don't even remember the format of those
> > codes.
>
> I still have the sources for LDSShell (Delphi Pascal), they are free for
> anyone wanting to have a look at them. I can't see any checking of return
> codes, all LDSShell does is capture the file LDS.ERR with all the 'compiler'
> errors and indicates the lines with red.
>
> The big point with LDSShell is that it integrates a .DAT-viewer so you can
> see directly what your script is building.
Thank for pointing this out. I think LDSShell is the better way to use LDS
anyway.
As I never used Pascal or Delphi, I do not understand the code nor can port that
to VBExpress that I am using.
cu
mikeheide
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: LETGUI new version 0.1.0.14
|
| (...) I still have the sources for LDSShell (Delphi Pascal), they are free for anyone wanting to have a look at them. I can't see any checking of return codes, all LDSShell does is capture the file LDS.ERR with all the 'compiler' errors and (...) (16 years ago, 6-Aug-08, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
8 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
