Subject:
|
Re: Dear LSC, was: LDrawIni API (was: LDRAWPREDIRS LDRAWPOSTDIRS - additional search paths)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Mon, 9 Jul 2007 17:19:59 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
7837 times
|
| |
|
|
----- Original Message -----
From: "Kevin L. Clague" <kevin_clague@yahoo.com>
To: <lugnet.cad.dev@lugnet.com>
Sent: Monday, July 09, 2007 5:56 PM
Subject: Dear LSC, was: LDrawIni API (was: LDRAWPREDIRS LDRAWPOSTDIRS -
additional search paths)
> In lugnet.cad.dev, Lars C. Hassing wrote:
> > In lugnet.cad.dev, Michael Lachmann wrote:
> > > Don mentioned that already, it would be good to enable <SKIP> from the
> > > programm. Imagine an alternate set of files with <SKIP> flag before
> > > official ones. When the user can enable/disable the SKIP detection,
> > > the user can see the different view without to modify any ini file
> > > - on some systems users might not be able to modify these files
> > > (e.g. when running with a guest account).
> >
> > OK, <SKIP> will be parsed into a bit-flag LDSDF_SKIP and
> > LDrawIniComputeRealDirs
> > will have an extra parameter to include/exclude <SKIP> dirs:
> > KeepSkippedDirs, IncludeSkipDirs, DontSkipDirs, ExcludeSkipDirs,
> > SkipSkipDirs
> > - please come up with a good name...
> >
> > > > The last function is LDrawIniResetSearchDirs, only to be called from
> > > > the
> > > > LDrawSetup program - or if you wish to override the search to be the
> > > > standard one.
> > >
> > >
> > > Do we have to call LDrawIniResetSearchDirs before each call to
> > > LDrawIniComputeRealDirs?
> >
> > No. It is needed in LDrawSetup for a "Reset to default" button.
> > However, you may use it too if you wish to discard the search dirs
> > loaded by LDrawIniGet from the ini file and use the default search dirs
> > in stead.
> >
> >
> > > Don't you ever need FileIsFrom* flags when processing the files
> > > themself? If
> > > you use global variables you cannot tell, which flag belongs to which
> > > file?!
> >
> > Well, I call OpenDatFile and right after I use the FileIsFrom* flags.
> > However, L3P also calls OpenDatFile in other contexts (e.g. l3p -check)
> > where the default part type is irrelevant.
> > But I know it's bad design, I'll pass it as parameters in stead.
> >
> > > These library is ideal for me at least, and I like this suggestion. Well
> > > done Lars!
> >
> > Thanks, I'm glad you like it.
> >
> > > Is there any interest out there on a c++ class? If yes, I'll write a
> > > well
> > > documented one otherwice I do the quick and dirty way without comments
> > > and
> > > documentation :-)
> >
> > :-) As mentioned earlier I need to stick to C code, but you are welcome.
> > /Lars
>
> Dear LSC,
>
> I examined the LDraw website and was unable to find formalization for the
> support of optional part paths. I'm updating LPub and would like to
> include
> support for this concept of alternate paths for LDraw parts. The PRE and
> POST
> concepts make sense to me.
>
> Parts authors would want PRE to point to directories where they have
> updated
> or new parts.
>
> Mere mortal users would want POST to point to the directories where the
> unofficial parts are stored.
>
> The above implementation seems Windows environment specific. Could we
> possibly
> have a more platform independent method? It would seem that this is best
> specified outside an LDraw file because not all people will have their
> parts
> directories organized the same way.
>
> One simple implementation would be to simply to specify the name of
> official
> directories for pre and post. This way we would not need a separate
> method and
> data files for specifying and accessing this information. The unofficial
> parts
> bulk package would dump its files into post.
>
> Could we get a formal specification for this>
>
> Keep up the good work and thanks,
> Kevin
How do these differ from an official "unofficial" sub-directory? - see
http://news.lugnet.com/cad/dev/mac/?n=768
The LSC has already voted against having a formal "unofficial"
sub-directory, prefering to leave it to software authors, so we may take
some convincing.
From a programming point of view, so long as you read PRE and POST from some
system (environment) variables you should be platform independant as both
Windows and Unix support them.
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Convention for directoried for unofficial parts?
|
| To all developers, The LSC does not want to specify how unofficial parts are handled. Personally if find the recommendation that we pull down individual unofficial parts into the same directory as our LDraw file a hassle. Would the group prefer (...) (17 years ago, 9-Jul-07, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | Convention for directories for unofficial parts?
|
| To all developers, The LSC does not want to specify how unofficial parts are handled. Personally if find the recommendation that we pull down individual unofficial parts into the same directory as our LDraw file a hassle. Would the group prefer (...) (17 years ago, 9-Jul-07, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
Message is in Reply To:
132 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
