 | | Re: Change to existing policy on embedding POV-Ray code in Official Files —Tore Eriksson
|
| | | (...) Lars has already been implementing that support since... what year? 2004? Probably even longer. I may would have joined it, but it didn't work then and I still can't get it to work now, 3½ years later. (tried testdoc.pov) And, like I said, (...) (17 years ago, 1-Jul-07, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Change to existing policy on embedding POV-Ray code in Official Files —Orion Pobursky
|
| | | | (...) At the risk of reigniting this argument, I still hold to the original reasons for disallowing EmPOV: - The POV-RAY SDL is not under the control of the LSC. This means that if the POV-Ray Team decides to depreciate a command (which they have (...) (17 years ago, 1-Jul-07, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Change to existing policy on embedding POV-Ray code in Official Files —Timothy Gould
|
| | | | (...) I'd _like_ to see a meta-language for basic shapes defined in their primitives (the current naming system would be fine if it was consistent) as that could be used in converter software of all hues. I also realise this isn't likely to happen (...) (17 years ago, 1-Jul-07, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | |
