Subject:
|
Re: LSC - current status?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Wed, 17 May 2006 16:25:29 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
4268 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev, Chris Dee wrote:
> In lugnet.cad.dev, Willy Tschager wrote:
> > In lugnet.cad.dev, Kevin L. Clague wrote:
> > > In lugnet.cad.dev, Willy Tschager wrote:
> >
> > I'm not in the mood to add a meta-command to the part after it gets
> > supported by a prog, submit it for a single line and cancel all the votes it > may has collected.
> >
> >
> > w.
>
> Actually, I don't have a problem with changing part header information with an
> admin edit without destroying the existing votes, and have done this many times.
> I would draw the line at changing data which affects the integrity of the part -
> such as swicthing the BFC CERTIFY winding.
>
> I believe this stance is consistent with not accepting HOLD votes for perceived
> problems in the header - the review should be of the CAD representation of the
> real part, not the metadata.
>
> On the subject of internationalisation, I'd rather see the translations managed
> separately from the part files. This makes sense from an ownership perspective -
> someone with good English/Swedish skills could manage the Swedish translation
> table, but we can't expect the Library Admins to have full understanding of
> _all_ potential foreign languages. Whichever technique we use, it has an impact
> on the applications that use the library, just different impacts.
>
> Chris
Could the translation not be managed at the user end? For example we could make
a program "partstranslate" which reads in one or more translation table(s) (just
Swedish in this case) and goes through all parts adding a new line something
like what follows
0 KEYWORDS (SWEDISH) transa, transb, transc
with translations of every keyword it can translate. This would mean that a
Swedish owner could then run this program whenever he or she updates their
library.
If this has legal implications, the keywords could be added to another file with
a list of parts and their translated keywords.
A part author could, of course, add their own international keywords.
I could easily be missing something obvious here but perhaps this could be a
first stage solution with an automated version of it running on the ldraw
servers for newer parts.
Tim
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: LSC - current status?
|
| (...) Actually, I don't have a problem with changing part header information with an admin edit without destroying the existing votes, and have done this many times. I would draw the line at changing data which affects the integrity of the part - (...) (19 years ago, 17-May-06, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
15 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
