 | | Re: The use of type 5 lines for smoothing of objects.
|
|
"Don Heyse" <dheyse@hotmail.spam....away.com> wrote in message > >Perhaps we could solve the speed problem by inserting a comment before (...) This sounds possible. The only problem is that they all have to be inserted as comments because older (...) (22 years ago, 8-May-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: The use of type 5 lines for smoothing of objects.
|
|
Hmmm, Finally a use for the type 5 lines I've been ignoring :) (I have another - so far successful - way of drawing in those lines) (...) Well alot of this leads in a direction I've mentioned before. Which is adding strip and mesh info into the (...) (22 years ago, 8-May-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: The use of type 5 lines for smoothing of objects.
|
|
(...) I tend to agree with you. My suggestion to Travis was based on about 2 seconds of thought when I read his email. It occured to me that type 2 lines are used to denote hard edges so I mentioned the possibility of using them instead of type 5 (...) (22 years ago, 8-May-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: The use of type 5 lines for smoothing of objects.
|
|
(...) indicator (...) on (...) places (...) having (...) This looks indeed like a more general way to do it. A big problem however will be complex patterns on a face, like on a shield. There will be a lot useless checking, because for every edge in (...) (22 years ago, 8-May-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: bug report: "cert." list on tracker
|
|
(Please notice "follow-up"! ;-) (...) I'd be a good candidate for grumpy, myself... Or sleepy... Or sneezy, for that matter (I got some *really bad* allergies!)... Or Doc, maybe... ;-) Franklin (22 years ago, 8-May-02, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
