 | | Re: New tool: LDDesignPad 0.3 for LDraw
|
|
(...) It is very exciting to me. I'm running the Swedish version of Win98 at home, and that means in LDAO I have to: 1. Replace all decimal points in the file to inline with commas. 2. Replace all decimal points in the type 1 line(s) I want to (...) (23 years ago, 27-Feb-02, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: New tool: LDDesignPad 0.3 for LDraw
|
|
(...) I'm curious, what's so exciting about another inliner? I was under the impression that there were plenty of inliners around, especially for Windows. Or are you still using windows 3.1? (...) Yes. It would be nice to be able to specify (...) (23 years ago, 27-Feb-02, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: New tool: LDDesignPad 0.3 for LDraw
|
|
(...) Me too. In a near future, I don't have to have a separate PC with Win95 or English Win98 to run LDAO on. :) (...) I had some problem with inlining disabled, too. I noticed that if I had two successive type 1 lines, inlining of the first one (...) (23 years ago, 27-Feb-02, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Will LMPL be Simulation-approach or Usage-approach ?
|
|
DG> Do not forget to download Spiderbot.dat (in lugnet.cad.models) It came automatically via e-mail. :) DG> We embody two different well-known approaches. Both of LCD and LMPL embody these two approaches. DG> First : the Simulation approach. DG> And (...) (23 years ago, 27-Feb-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.lcd)
|
| |
| | Re[4]: I have read the article about LCD
|
|
Hi Damien! DG> Now you speak about layers. DG> That is precisely what I called "multiple syntax levels". DG> Software layers are known to be very bad for software engineering and design DG> in general. I don't think so. What about object oriented (...) (23 years ago, 27-Feb-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.lcd)
|
