To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.cad.devOpen lugnet.cad.dev in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 CAD / Development / *790 (-5)
  Re: MPD Question...
 
(...) I *suppose* it should not rely on it. But it would be a good first indicator. Steve (26 years ago, 22-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  Re: MPD Question...
 
LDLite currently does not rely on the filename for anything. But if it could use the extension to tell .dat and .mpd files apart, that would help. Should it? -gyug (...) (26 years ago, 21-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  Re: part naming ideas
 
(...) or "ResQ chainsaw body", or "Race pneumatic hammer body"? (...) "Town Flashlight"? (...) "Ninja Flying platform handlebars"? (...) "Town Camcorder"? (...) "Paradisa beachcomber metal detector"? Perhaps theme groupings are very useful. -gyug (26 years ago, 21-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  Re: part naming ideas
 
(...) How about "Minifig Accessory"? (26 years ago, 21-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  L3P + L3GO - rumor or fact?
 
Is it true that L3P will now use L3GO bricks where available? If so, where should the L3GO part files be placed? I ask because of my quest for perfection on a perfectly-rendered Galaxy Explorer, and those sloped cones are just God-awful ugly right (...) (26 years ago, 20-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)


Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more

Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR