|
|
 | | Re: Line in the Sand
|
| The proposal has been updated, with changes from Lars and Gary, some additional definitions, and a new section of parts guidelines. See it at (URL). The revision marks (along the left margin) will be maintained until we've got a final document, (...) (26 years ago, 21-Oct-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | | | Re: Line in the Sand
|
| (...) Yes. How are you on travel? :-) (26 years ago, 21-Oct-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | | | Re: Several replies to CLIPPING / WINDING
|
| (...) Sorry, you are right here. I allways think in some form of winding (CW or CCW) so this one slipped me, once again sorry, you are right. Can't assume nothing. (...) what I said was relative to my way of thinking, without the previous sentence, (...) (26 years ago, 21-Oct-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | | | Re: Line in the Sand
|
| (...) Thanks. (blushing) Can that be translated into paying work? (...) That's because it's written by someone who keeps the matrix-math reference material very close at hand whenever he's got to actually go under the hood. (...) Issue 1: should the (...) (26 years ago, 21-Oct-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | | | Re: Object Orientation & DAT files & CLIPPING/WINDING
|
| (...) You are right. Or more precisely, I was wrong. Matrix-based *inversions* are not required. But matrix-based mirrorings will be necessary, for asymmetric primitives, like 1-4cyls.dat. (...) I was thinking about some approach that would map (...) (26 years ago, 21-Oct-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
|
