 | | Re: Line in the Sand
|
|
(...) Yes. How are you on travel? :-) (25 years ago, 21-Oct-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Several replies to CLIPPING / WINDING
|
|
(...) Sorry, you are right here. I allways think in some form of winding (CW or CCW) so this one slipped me, once again sorry, you are right. Can't assume nothing. (...) what I said was relative to my way of thinking, without the previous sentence, (...) (25 years ago, 21-Oct-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Line in the Sand
|
|
(...) Thanks. (blushing) Can that be translated into paying work? (...) That's because it's written by someone who keeps the matrix-math reference material very close at hand whenever he's got to actually go under the hood. (...) Issue 1: should the (...) (25 years ago, 21-Oct-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Object Orientation & DAT files & CLIPPING/WINDING
|
|
(...) You are right. Or more precisely, I was wrong. Matrix-based *inversions* are not required. But matrix-based mirrorings will be necessary, for asymmetric primitives, like 1-4cyls.dat. (...) I was thinking about some approach that would map (...) (25 years ago, 21-Oct-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Line in the Sand
|
|
Gary Williams wrote in message ... (...) a (...) Well, what I meant to say is: Matrices with negative determinants may be used for mirroring a part, BUT the matrix should never be assumed to perform the actual inversion. If a matrix has a negative (...) (25 years ago, 21-Oct-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Line in the Sand
|
|
Steve Bliss wrote in message <380e2b8e.12563517@l...et.com>... (...) An orientation matrix doesn't contain enough information to invert an asymmetrical part; if you assume it does, this would result in a part with a mirrored shape. I propose that (...) (25 years ago, 21-Oct-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Line in the Sand
|
|
Steve Bliss wrote... (...) Good idea, it's hard to discuss in so many threads. (...) Thank you for the well-written summary. Well-written because I agree with 99% of it ;) (...) Yes, too bad I'm off for an Internet-free :( 4-day week-end at the sea (...) (25 years ago, 21-Oct-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Line in the Sand
|
|
(...) I would. This is WAY better than most of the crap requirements I have to rationalize into some semblance of something to keep paying customers happy. Very nice work, Steve. Written in a way that made it understandable to someone that doesn't (...) (25 years ago, 20-Oct-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Object Orientation & DAT files & CLIPPING/WINDING [DAT]
|
|
Steve Bliss wrote... (...) "Hey, (...) But it *is* compatible with LDraw! You left out my example (which BTW had the INVERT placed incorrectly :-), so I'll repeat it. stud2.dat is the hollow stud used on technic bricks. It uses two cylinders: 1 16 0 (...) (25 years ago, 20-Oct-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Line in the Sand
|
|
OK, we've been discussing how to best extend the LDraw language to allow rendering engines to do backface-culling. We've got a pretty good agreement on most of what is needed. I think it would be productive, at this point, to work from a complete (...) (25 years ago, 20-Oct-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
