 | | Re: Line in the Sand
|
|
Steve Bliss wrote in message <380e2b8e.12563517@l...et.com>... (...) An orientation matrix doesn't contain enough information to invert an asymmetrical part; if you assume it does, this would result in a part with a mirrored shape. I propose that (...) (25 years ago, 21-Oct-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Line in the Sand
|
|
Steve Bliss wrote... (...) Good idea, it's hard to discuss in so many threads. (...) Thank you for the well-written summary. Well-written because I agree with 99% of it ;) (...) Yes, too bad I'm off for an Internet-free :( 4-day week-end at the sea (...) (25 years ago, 21-Oct-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Line in the Sand
|
|
(...) I would. This is WAY better than most of the crap requirements I have to rationalize into some semblance of something to keep paying customers happy. Very nice work, Steve. Written in a way that made it understandable to someone that doesn't (...) (25 years ago, 20-Oct-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Object Orientation & DAT files & CLIPPING/WINDING [DAT]
|
|
Steve Bliss wrote... (...) "Hey, (...) But it *is* compatible with LDraw! You left out my example (which BTW had the INVERT placed incorrectly :-), so I'll repeat it. stud2.dat is the hollow stud used on technic bricks. It uses two cylinders: 1 16 0 (...) (25 years ago, 20-Oct-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Line in the Sand
|
|
OK, we've been discussing how to best extend the LDraw language to allow rendering engines to do backface-culling. We've got a pretty good agreement on most of what is needed. I think it would be productive, at this point, to work from a complete (...) (25 years ago, 20-Oct-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Minifigure Torso Generator
|
|
Hi , at 19.10.99 Jonathan Wilson wrote in a mail: JW> The password is modelling (mabie that should be in the faq? Maybe. There I had realy not been looking for a password, my fault. JW> -- Jonathan Wilson wilsonj@xoommail.com JW> (URL) Joachim. (URL) (25 years ago, 20-Oct-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Several replies to CLIPPING / WINDING
|
|
(...) No. With current files, you don't know, so you can't assume anything. (...) No, inversions are common. (...) Right. So non-wound-up files can't be backface culled. I don't see what you're getting at here. (...) But we don't get to specify what (...) (25 years ago, 20-Oct-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Several replies to CLIPPING / WINDING
|
|
(...) This is a problem of the current design (the one beeing used now). You didn't knew in the past, because you didn't have the 0 INVERT meta-command. So you can only assume it' NOT inverted. If for some reason, it is inverted, then the old .DAT (...) (25 years ago, 20-Oct-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Fixed #3228a is ready
|
|
I'm suffering from burnout working just half-time and therefore I have some time over. Had to look up the word "tapered" in my dictonary. That's my only faint objection. Thanks for your trouble, /Tore (...) (25 years ago, 20-Oct-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Several replies to CLIPPING / WINDING
|
|
(...) That's not true. If a super-file is not certified, then there's no way to tell if the subfile is normal or inverted. So when a file is referenced by a non-certified super-file, it can't be clipped, even if the referenced file is certified. (...) (25 years ago, 20-Oct-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
