 | | Re: "Well-Formed" LDraw (Was: regular expressions for DAT file subpart lines)
|
|
(...) Oh, good. Then I wrote something close to correct. :) (...) That's probably a good idea. Most people will just scratch their heads at them, but some people would find it useful. Steve (25 years ago, 25-Jun-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: LDAO Suggestion Mark 2
|
|
(...) OK. I've added code for that specific case. I will review the other file commands, and make sure they have protection as well. Steve (25 years ago, 25-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: LDAO Suggestion Mark 2
|
|
(...) No, File/New Model File. I don't usually change the names of files while working on them (I always do it outside of the programs), so I've never encountered any other problems like this. Jeff (25 years ago, 25-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: do these parts exist in ldraw?
|
|
(...) It exists deep down in my ToDo-bucket. Will probable not be done by me this millenium... (...) ??? (...) ??? (...) ??? Give me some set numbers... /Tore (25 years ago, 25-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: "Well-Formed" LDraw (Was: regular expressions for DAT file subpart lines)
|
|
Hey now, that's beginning to look like the yacc grammer for LDRAW in the LDLite source code. If you want to get precise in the language spec, grab the LDLite lex and yacc files and either take them as the defacto standard or modify them to handle (...) (25 years ago, 25-Jun-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
