|
| | Re: stud.dat vs STUD.DAT
|
| (...) Maybe. The stud-as-line drawing, and the location of the stud, are pretty obvious already. So it is not critically needed. -- Terry K -- (25 years ago, 30-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | | stud.dat vs STUD.DAT
|
| i think that the stud.dat reference in the technic pin 1/2 should be capatilised (25 years ago, 30-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | | what happened to the train wheel rubber ring
|
| i remember seeing something about the train wheel rubber ring being made... who made it and where can i get it? (25 years ago, 30-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | | part renaming ideas
|
| here are some part re-naming ideas castle dragon flame to minifig fire castle goblet to minifig goblet castle lance to minifig lance castle magic wand to minifig magic wand castle pike to minifig pike castle shield to minifig shield castle sword to (...) (25 years ago, 30-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | | Re: part question: 30358
|
| (...) Yes, it is necessary. (...) First off, I would not use the primitives for this intersection. Once the highest Y value of the intersecting curve is known, I would scale the stud2a.dat primitive to reach that point. To find the points for the (...) (25 years ago, 30-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |