To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.cad.devOpen lugnet.cad.dev in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 CAD / Development / *1920 (-5)
  stud.dat vs STUD.DAT
 
i think that the stud.dat reference in the technic pin 1/2 should be capatilised (25 years ago, 30-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  what happened to the train wheel rubber ring
 
i remember seeing something about the train wheel rubber ring being made... who made it and where can i get it? (25 years ago, 30-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  part renaming ideas
 
here are some part re-naming ideas castle dragon flame to minifig fire castle goblet to minifig goblet castle lance to minifig lance castle magic wand to minifig magic wand castle pike to minifig pike castle shield to minifig shield castle sword to (...) (25 years ago, 30-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  Re: part question: 30358
 
(...) Yes, it is necessary. (...) First off, I would not use the primitives for this intersection. Once the highest Y value of the intersecting curve is known, I would scale the stud2a.dat primitive to reach that point. To find the points for the (...) (25 years ago, 30-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  fixes??
 
Is it possible for someone to fix the stud.dat primitives so there aren't holes in the tops of the studs in the detail lines? Or is this only the way every brick and plate draws on my system? it seems there is always a hole in the detail line upper (...) (25 years ago, 29-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)


Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more

Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR