 | | Re: New parts header format validated by the LSC
|
|
(...) I would like to amend the Parts Tracker so that authors would not need to worry about this and the submit process would standardise this line. Chris (18 years ago, 15-Sep-06, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Parts Releases and the CA
|
|
(...) --snip-- Just redid and submitted 32523 Tim (18 years ago, 14-Sep-06, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: New parts header format validated by the LSC
|
|
(...) the LSC hasn't voted on this issue yet and dropped the argument during discussion to speed up the voting on the actual header (which was a wise approach). anyway, the proposal is as following: 0 !LDRAW_ORG Unofficial_Part| Unofficial_Subpart| (...) (18 years ago, 14-Sep-06, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: New parts header format validated by the LSC
|
|
Hi Travis, how does this command line look like in unofficial parts (files I submit on the parts tracker)? 0 !LDRAW_ORG Part|Subpart|Primiti...e|Shortcut UPDATE YYYY-RR is it still the old 0 Type: Unofficial Element|Primitive|... line? And what kind (...) (18 years ago, 14-Sep-06, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | RE: Parts Releases and the CA
|
|
likewise part 50.dat should be 6628.dat -----Original Message----- From: news-gateway@lugnet.com [mailto:news-gateway...ugnet.com] On Behalf Of William Howard Sent: 14 September 2006 00:12 To: lugnet.cad.dev.org.l...lugnet.com Subject: Re: Parts (...) (18 years ago, 13-Sep-06, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
