 | | Re: part: brick 1 x 2 with arm 2F
|
|
Jonathan wilson: (...) I mean that you should not have referenced ARM1.DAT in a file purporting to represent part #30014. Granted, ARM1.DAT is the least incorrect of all subparts that you could have referenced, but it is still incorrect. (...) No. (...) (26 years ago, 13-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Lugnet.cad.dat heirarchy
|
|
(...) I like those. I think "sets" is a lot clearer than anything containing the letters "tlg", especially when placed alongside "parts" or "elements" and "creations." It's also nice and short, easy to type. :) OK, let's summarize all of the (...) (26 years ago, 13-Apr-99, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: [ldraw.org] TLG Models
|
|
I think that this would be a good idea, just like it would be good to have a lugnet.cad.dat.part newsgroup so that people only wanting to see models wouldn't have to get part posts on cad.dat. I am NOT speaking of myself. There are a million(well (...) (26 years ago, 13-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: [ldraw.org] Eve of Beginnings
|
|
(...) Always a good idea. Heavy on the hd space, but a good idea. (26 years ago, 13-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: [ldraw.org] Eve of Beginnings
|
|
(...) I always have difficulty remembering exactly how I made an image, so it's often difficult to add more later. Why don't you carefully document how you make the images so you don't have the same problem? I would also suggest saving a Photoshop (...) (26 years ago, 13-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
