 | | Re: 11-16 primitives? —Travis Cobbs
| | | | (...) These truncated filenames never went past the LSC, and as such should probably be held. I personally feel that they are inappropriate, but whether or not I think they are appropriate, I believe that it's the LSC's job to determine that. (...) (16 years ago, 25-Sep-09, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: 11-16 primitives? —Philippe Hurbain
| | | | | (...) Well... imho this should not be an issue at all - if the parts tracker was updated! Philo (16 years ago, 25-Sep-09, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
| | | | | | |
