To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitivesOpen lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 CAD / LDraw Files / Parts / Primitives / 409
408  |  410
Subject: 
CCW vs CW
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives
Date: 
Thu, 12 May 2005 21:01:48 GMT
Viewed: 
4791 times
  
The LDraw Language Extension for Clipping (BFC) states in the Parts Library Guidelines section that Primitives should always use CCW winding. However some of the primitives use CW, for example rect.dat. Should these be rewritten?

Would it be an advantege to use CCW throughout primitives, subparts and parts?

Christian

BTW the LDraw Primitives Reference-link under Links & Resources is broken



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: CCW vs CW
 
(...) If it's not a whole lot of trouble, I would recommend it. (The conversion can be made automatic, as long as the individual files clearly state CW or CCW correctly.) Speaking as a computer graphics professional, I can say for sure that being (...) (20 years ago, 13-May-05, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives, FTX)

2 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR