 | | Re: stud3 -- hollow vs filled —Steve Bliss
| | | | (...) Hello, James! [snip description of situation leading up to the question] (...) The standard in the LDraw library is to use stud3.dat for all stud3-type anti-studs, regardless of whether they are actually hollow or solid. The reason is that (...) (20 years ago, 23-Dec-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: stud3 -- hollow vs filled —Larry Pieniazek
| | | | | | (...) Note that FWIW, BrickLink and Peeron and other inventory resources tend not to get to this level of detail either, they typically do not differentiate this. (20 years ago, 23-Dec-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: stud3 -- hollow vs filled —Chris Dee
| | | | | (...) Since this question crops up at regular intervals, I've added an explanatory note to the Primitives Reference : (URL) Chris (20 years ago, 23-Dec-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
| | | | | | |
