| |
In lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives, James Mastros wrote:
> Hello, everyone.
Hello, James!
[snip description of situation leading up to the question]
> Should I keep inlining the studs (there's only two of them in this case),
> submit a new primitive along with the updated 71427, or use stud3 on the
> theory that it's too minor a difference to care about?
The standard in the LDraw library is to use stud3.dat for all stud3-type
anti-studs, regardless of whether they are actually hollow or solid. The reason
is that it's basically a non-functional difference which is too minor to worry
about.
Also, LEGO has changed their molding over time, so some parts have both
solid-stud3 and hollow-stud3 variations.
Steve
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | stud3 -- hollow vs filled
|
| Hello, everyone. When I was working on 71427 (expect a post on l.c.d.parts soon), I noticed that the two small underside studs were modeled with a pair of cyli4-4s and a disk1. When looking for the proper primitive to replace that with, I noticed (...) (20 years ago, 23-Dec-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives, FTX)
|
4 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
