Subject:
|
Re: New Part : Pirate Peg Leg
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dat.parts
|
Date:
|
Thu, 23 Mar 2000 22:49:43 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1655 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dat.parts, Franklin W. Cain writes:
> Hi!
>
> OK, this is a really petty/minor nitpick,
> but I think that the first line should read
> "Minifig Leg Pegleg" (and not "Minifig Leg Wooden").
>
> Also, if I may ask,
> why didn't you use any of the "cone" primitives?
> (I'm still learning this stuff myself,
> so this second comment is more a request
> for info/enlightenment, not a nitpick.)
>
> Thanks,
> Franklin
I've not got a strong affection for "Minifig Leg Wooden", so am happy for
this to get amended at the voting stage, if necessary. "Minifig Leg Pegleg"
is fine too.
Regarding cones, well yes I could have used four 1-4con4 primitives for the
vertical part of the leg, but each facet and optional line needed extending
to intersect with the horizontal cylinders, so it didn't seen worth it.
Chris
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: New Part : Pirate Peg Leg
|
| Hi! OK, this is a really petty/minor nitpick, but I think that the first line should read "Minifig Leg Pegleg" (and not "Minifig Leg Wooden"). Also, if I may ask, why didn't you use any of the "cone" primitives? (I'm still learning this stuff (...) (25 years ago, 23-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
4 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
