 | | Re: New Part : Pirate Peg Leg —Franklin W. Cain
| | | | Hi! OK, this is a really petty/minor nitpick, but I think that the first line should read "Minifig Leg Pegleg" (and not "Minifig Leg Wooden"). Also, if I may ask, why didn't you use any of the "cone" primitives? (I'm still learning this stuff (...) (25 years ago, 23-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: New Part : Pirate Peg Leg —Chris Dee
| | | | | (...) I've not got a strong affection for "Minifig Leg Wooden", so am happy for this to get amended at the voting stage, if necessary. "Minifig Leg Pegleg" is fine too. Regarding cones, well yes I could have used four 1-4con4 primitives for the (...) (25 years ago, 23-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: New Part : Pirate Peg Leg —Steve Bliss
| | | | | (...) You could stick in a 0 KEYWORDS pegleg line. LDList and Partsref both recognize this meta-command. (...) Hmm... Steve (25 years ago, 24-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
| | | | | | |
