Subject:
|
Re: 2951 repost
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dat.parts
|
Date:
|
Sat, 22 Jan 2000 21:03:03 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
466 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dat.parts, Tore Eriksson writes:
>
>
> John Jensen wrote:
>
> > 1 16 -92 -28 -58 0 1 0 -12.31 0 33.83 33.83 0 12.31 48/1-4edge.dat
> > 1 16 -92 -28 -58 0 1 0 35.08 0 8.10 8.10 0 -35.08 48/1-8edge.dat
> > 1 16 92 -28 -58 0 1 0 35.08 0 8.10 8.10 0 -35.08 48/1-8edge.dat
> > 1 16 92 -28 -58 0 1 0 -12.31 0 33.83 33.83 0 12.31 48/1-4edge.dat
>
>
> Is it ok to use shashes and not backslashes in a pure DOS environment? I wouldn't
> recommend it, but then again, not too many run DOS nowadays?
I was a bit pussled over this too, but I figure that LDraw is clever enough
to figure it out for itself:) (changing / to \ doesn't solve my problem
either btw.)
But I have this nagging feeling that I'm missing something here...
When putting new primitives to use, is it then enough to just place them in
the p or p/48/ dir? or should I run some sort of update utility?
Remember I am quite new to this, so consider me being an ignorant fool, who
knows absolutely nothing:)
Regards
John Jensen
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: 2951 repost
|
| (...) It should be sufficient to put the primitives in the proper location. There's nothing else that needs to be update. Steve (24 years ago, 24-Jan-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: 2951 repost
|
| (...) Is it ok to use shashes and not backslashes in a pure DOS environment? I wouldn't recommend it, but then again, not too many run DOS nowadays? /Tore (24 years ago, 22-Jan-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
7 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
