 | | Inappropriate(?) use of stud.dat in 30035.dat —Travis Cobbs
|
| | | 30035.dat uses stud.dat in a location that isn't really a stud, but is the same shape as a stud. This leads to a rendering problem if stud logos are enabled: (URL) (Notice the LEGO logo peeking out from under the pole.) Is the above considered (...) (17 years ago, 25-Mar-08, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Inappropriate(?) use of stud.dat in 30035.dat —Michael Heidemann
|
| | | | (...) As far as I remember this is formally ok. But you are right, this should be avoided. Please correct that and send the file to the PT. cu mikeheide (17 years ago, 25-Mar-08, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Inappropriate(?) use of stud.dat in 30035.dat —Philippe Hurbain
|
| | | | | (...) Perhaps if there was a unit capped cylinder in the primitives authors would not be driven to use studs? Philo (17 years ago, 26-Mar-08, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Inappropriate(?) use of stud.dat in 30035.dat —Michael Heidemann
|
| | | | | | (...) You are right, but there are only three lines of code (easily created with MLCad) that would be substituted with such a new primitive. I think it is not worth. cu mikeheide (17 years ago, 26-Mar-08, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Inappropriate(?) use of stud.dat in 30035.dat —Travis Cobbs
|
| | | | (...) OK, I sent an updated version to the tracker admins, and BFCd it while I was at it. --Travis (17 years ago, 26-Mar-08, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
| | | | |
