 | | Re: Getting rif off the 8.3 nomenclature??? —Travis Cobbs
| | | | (...) I'm personally undecided on the issue of long filenames. On the one hand Willy is entirely correct that we probably shouldn't disallow them purely because of ldraw.exe/ledit.exe. On the other hand, Kevin's post that LPub/LSynth would both have (...) (17 years ago, 28-Mar-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Getting rif off the 8.3 nomenclature??? —Steve Bliss
| | | | | (...) Or, we should start by introducing the new standard, use it in a few (relatively obscure) instances, and give the various software authors a chance to sort it out. Considering the general pace of parts releases, a long-named file would be on (...) (17 years ago, 28-Mar-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
| | | | | | |
