 | | Re: Hook Coupling 737c01.dat and 444.dat train wheel. —Chris Dee
|
| | | (...) There is a logic to Niels' xNNN numbers and although this has been explained several times before, it probably deserves repeating. The LDraw convention for part numbers (initiated by James Jessiman) is to use 3-digit part numbers where the (...) (20 years ago, 23-Nov-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Hook Coupling 737c01.dat and 444.dat train wheel. —Jindrich Kubec
|
| | | | | (...) Wouldn't it be best to create 'inventorying policy'? Inventorying is much faster than actually modelling the parts, so the {ldraw} part library is {in my eyes} just a subset of peeron library. And while you think about some new policies, some (...) (20 years ago, 23-Nov-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Hook Coupling 737c01.dat and 444.dat train wheel. —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | | (...) There are, I believe, efforts ongoing behind the scenes to unify and improve the part number assignment/tracking/allocation process and this is one facet of that. I am not sure the principals in the matter are ready to speak out about it. (...) (20 years ago, 25-Nov-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Hook Coupling 737c01.dat and 444.dat train wheel. —Reinhard "Ben" Beneke
|
| | | | (...) [SNIP] (...) Dear Chris, thanks for your patience with stupid newbies like me. Sorry for being not able to find out these things for myself. Your explanation has now been very clear and (semi-)logical for me. I would have wished to find a (...) (20 years ago, 24-Nov-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| | | | |
