 | | Re: Why is the Thickness of Liftarms changing?
|
|
(...) I confirm Pauls measurement. I compared it with a brick and it has the same thickness. This is also needed to connect a pin with the holes. CU Bernd (22 years ago, 1-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Why is the Thickness of Liftarms changing?
|
|
(...) What are you using to measure with? I use a dial caliper. Paul (22 years ago, 1-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Why is the Thickness of Liftarms changing?
|
|
(...) I've measured these and several others have as well and we all got 18 LDU -Orion (22 years ago, 1-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Why is the Thickness of Liftarms changing?
|
|
(...) Yes that seems strange, as far as I can tell all these liftarms are the same width as a 1xN brick, so should be modelled as 20LDU as the bricks are. ROSCO (22 years ago, 31-Dec-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Why is the Thickness of Liftarms changing?
|
|
This part is on the Part Tracker; (URL) 32278 I have has a thickness of .0309" which is approximately 19.77LDU. Why are several of these liftarms getting changed to 18LDU? Paul (22 years ago, 31-Dec-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Keyword in description missing
|
|
(...) OK - I'll make it so. Chris (22 years ago, 28-Dec-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Keyword in description missing
|
|
(...) I feel pretty strongly that the title for all patterned parts should end in the word Pattern. I would consider this enough of a reason to make the change. (...) Steve (22 years ago, 28-Dec-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Pat 44567 - Hinge Plate 1 x 2 Locking with 1 Finger On Side
|
|
(...) Thank for the cortribution Mark but I posted this part to the Parts Tracker a few months ago: (URL) (22 years ago, 27-Dec-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Pat 44567 - Hinge Plate 1 x 2 Locking with 1 Finger On Side [DAT]
|
|
Thanks to Chris Dee <chris_w_dee@hotmail.com> for creating primative CLH6.DAT (Click Lock Hinge Single Finger for Plate Ends) available in the LDRAW_ORG Primitive UPDATE 2003-03. First time I saw this part was in bag 1 of the set 4024 - Advent (...) (22 years ago, 26-Dec-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Keyword in description missing
|
|
(...) I did not know this, however... (...) strong (...) ... I still think it would be more consistant to do so. After all, we did put many parts in a new category, renamed ones, etc. I do not see a problem. Or is there? (...) Pattern (...) Also I (...) (22 years ago, 23-Dec-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
