(...) Based on the charter, cad.dat.parts would not be the right group (unless the tyre had been posted to cad.dat.parts, and you posted a follow-up to that posting). But there seems to be a need for group(s) for focus(s)ed discussion of part files, (...) (23 years ago, 13-May-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
(...) Snipped the rest and FUT to admin.suggestions. More on the actual issue later. I would like to suggest that a group (groups?) be created for focused discussion of parts files so that cad.dat.parts can return to being a group that has dat files (...) (23 years ago, 13-May-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.admin.suggestions)
