 | | Re: New Part: x192.dat - Minifig Shield Round —Tony Hafner
|
| | | When I downloaded this part, I can see that Lugnet's DAT download truncated the lines to 80 characters. This totally mangled the part. Is this a weakness of the Lugnet interface, or is it enforcing a standard? In other words, are part file lines (...) (22 years ago, 2-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: New Part: x192.dat - Minifig Shield Round —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | (...) It's a weakness of the posting method (the file came in via email). I believe the line-wrapping was performed by Willy's email software. I recommend that all DAT content be posted via LUGNET's web interface, to avoid this line-wrapping issue. (...) (22 years ago, 3-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: New Part: x192.dat - Minifig Shield Round —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | (...) Assuming some reasonable limit on the size of a number in digits (say 20 total including before and after the decimal place, that allows a very big and pretty precise number) isn't there sort of an upper bound on the line length likely to be (...) (22 years ago, 3-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: New Part: x192.dat - Minifig Shield Round —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | | | (...) Sure, that's possible. But by the time you get to a theoretical upper bound, you're way past the practical upper bound. So I'm not sure what the practical benefit would be. Steve (22 years ago, 4-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: New Part: x192.dat - Minifig Shield Round —Willy Tschager
|
| | | | (...) Sorry for the mess, I'll fix my settings before I post my next part. Willy (22 years ago, 4-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | |
