 | | Re: New part, need a part number. —Ronald Scott Moody
| | | | Ok, I figured it out. The original part used the rect.dat primitive which I replaced (I'm a neophite) with a quadrilateral. Soooo, I redid it again with a RECT.DAT instead of the quarilateral the way the original was and maybe this is more correct? (...) (24 years ago, 20-Feb-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: New part, need a part number. —Jacob Sparre Andersen
| | | | | Ronald: It looks correct now, but I haven't got the real thing here, so I can't say anything for certain. Play well, Jacob (24 years ago, 20-Feb-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
| | | | | | |
