 | | Re: New part, need a part number. [DAT]
|
| Ok, I figured it out. The original part used the rect.dat primitive which I replaced (I'm a neophite) with a quadrilateral. Soooo, I redid it again with a RECT.DAT instead of the quarilateral the way the original was and maybe this is more correct? (...) (24 years ago, 20-Feb-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
| | | | | Re: New part, need a part number.
|
| Ronald: It looks correct now, but I haven't got the real thing here, so I can't say anything for certain. Play well, Jacob (24 years ago, 20-Feb-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
| |
