 | | Re: Duplo parts? —Steve Bliss
|
| | | [this should go to either lugnet.cad.dat.parts...rimitives, or lugnet.cad.dev, but tight is the grip of inertia...] (...) That seems a bit thin for the walls. I'll dig out some DUPLO bricks, and look at them more closely. (...) Hmm. That's a height (...) (23 years ago, 2-Jan-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Duplo parts? —Don Rogerson
|
| | | | | ... (...) Regarding this and the wall thickness, I don't have an instrument to accurately measure. I actually scaled the model up on my computer screen until the body matched, then compared the stud height,holding a brick to the screen. I'd love it (...) (23 years ago, 3-Jan-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Duplo parts? —Tore Eriksson
|
| | | | | (...) Take a 3001 (Brick 4x2) and put a 3437 (Duplo Brick 2 x 2) on top. The 3001's studs end at 4 LDU from the edge, and The Duplo brick fits perfectly well on top, and it ends where the 3001 ends. So the Duplo wall must be exactly 4 LDU. Also note (...) (23 years ago, 4-Jan-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Duplo parts? —Lars C. Hassing
|
| | | | | In lugnet.cad.dat.parts Steve Bliss wrote... (...) Yup... :) (...) There is: Primitive substitution! I found out that we (mis)use stud4.dat by scaling its height by 5 in bricks! (and other factors in other parts) If I add a rounded edge to (...) (23 years ago, 4-Jan-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Duplo parts? —Tony Hafner
|
| | | | (...) No, it's correct. If they were thicker, you wouldn't be able to put Duplo bricks on top of System bricks. (...) The stud height has changed over the years. The newer ones are quite close to 11. I haven't checked the older ones that closely. (...) (23 years ago, 5-Jan-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| | | | |
