Subject:
|
Re: New Part: Cylinder 2 x 2 x 2/3 Inverted Dome
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dat.parts
|
Date:
|
Wed, 14 Jun 2000 14:38:47 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2715 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dat.parts, Fredrik Glöckner wrote:
> I still agree with Thomas Burger with his choise of origin for the
> part, though. If you lower the part by 8 LDU, you would get the
> X-Z-plane where the base of the stud _would have been_ if it had a top
> stud. That appears to be more consistent with the existing parts in
> the LDraw library. What do other people think?
Why not set the part so the top is at Y=0? This would move the part down
16LDU, if I read the DAT correctly.
> Your part looks great to me! Thanks for the effort you spent!
I echo this sentiment. Very nice job.
Steve
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: New Part: Cylinder 2 x 2 x 2/3 Inverted Dome
|
| This one looks better than the version Thomas Burger posted recently, with details like the recessed half cylinders around the bottom stud connector. I still agree with Thomas Burger with his choise of origin for the part, though. If you lower the (...) (26 years ago, 14-Jun-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
4 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
