 | | Re: New Part: Brick 1 x 3 with Control Panel Pattern
|
|
Tore Eriksson <tore.eriksson@mbox3...wipnet.se> wrote in message news:38E7BBB7.8F4F08...pnet.se... (...) pattern will be. If you don't, the results (...) Actually the results will be predictably poor :-) -John Van (25 years ago, 4-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Influencing what parts people work on
|
|
(...) This is something that different Guild members have different opinions about. I've discussed my own views on this in the past... I tend to lean against it but others may not. My sense is that if our actions increase the number of parts (...) (25 years ago, 4-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Influencing what parts people work on
|
|
Just a thought.. I noticed that Jonathan B. Knudsen has released rendered instructions for some (all? not sure) of the robots from his book: (URL) Jonathan 'influenced' some decisions to make a few parts for his use in his book. Of course these (...) (25 years ago, 4-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Influencing what parts people work on
|
|
(...) I hope this works because this will finally get some of those castle decorated elements I have been wanting for ages. (25 years ago, 3-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: New Part: Minifig Binoculars Type 1
|
|
Thanks. It looks good! -John Van Paul Easter <pneaster@aol.com> wrote in message news:FsBFAL.Drr@lugnet.com... (...) (25 years ago, 3-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Influencing what parts people work on
|
|
(...) followed by silence from everyone else. Wrong group? Drop me a note if you think I should have posted this somewhere else... Thanks! The charter for cad.dat.parts didn't quite seem to fit. ++Lar (25 years ago, 3-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: My first part: 2x8 tile
|
|
Whoa, waitasecondhere.... A *TWO*-by-eight tile? From which set did you get this part? I've never seen a *two*-by-eight tile... (1x8s, yeah, sure, I've got zillions of 'em, but a *2*x8?...) Thanks, Franklin (25 years ago, 3-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: My first part: 2x8 tile
|
|
That's a good start. Do you know its part number? (...) Should be: 0 Tile 2 x 8 (...) (25 years ago, 2-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | My first part: 2x8 tile [DAT]
|
|
Well, it was easy to make this. Alan 0 Plate 2 x 8 1 16 60 4 0 1 0 0 0 -1 0 0 0 1 stud4.dat 1 16 40 4 0 1 0 0 0 -1 0 0 0 1 stud4.dat 1 16 20 4 0 1 0 0 0 -1 0 0 0 1 stud4.dat 1 16 0 4 0 1 0 0 0 -1 0 0 0 1 stud4.dat 1 16 -20 4 0 1 0 0 0 -1 0 0 0 1 (...) (25 years ago, 2-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: NEW PART: Cylinder 2 x 2 x 2/3 Inverted Dome [DAT]
|
|
Try this: 0 Cylinder 2 x 2 x 2/3 Inverted Dome 0 Name: x???.dat 0 Author: Kevin M Bane 4/02/2000 0 Un-Official Part 1 16 0 -4.5 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 4-4edge.dat 1 16 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 -4.5 0 0 0 6 4-4cyli.dat 1 16 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 4-4edge.dat 2 24 (...) (25 years ago, 2-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
