 | | Re: A discovery? and part 3475
|
|
John VanZwieten <john_vanzwieten@email.msn.com> wrote in message news:Fs5MrI.325@lugnet.com... (...) can (...) show (...) Never mind--you answered in another post. -John Van (25 years ago, 28-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: A discovery? and part 3475
|
|
John Jensen <skurt@vip.cybercity.dk> wrote in message news:18a2esk6si8dbum...4ax.com... (...) Why not just use the ring and cone primitives? Used in combinations, you can create just about any size ring or cone from these primitives, and they show (...) (25 years ago, 28-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: A discovery? and part 3475
|
|
(...) I've done a similar thing myself a few times to generate a cone (and similar things), and I've been thinking about making a function in LDraw-mode to make the process easier. But I failed to see how to formalize the procedure, so I suspended (...) (25 years ago, 28-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | A discovery? and part 3475 [DAT]
|
|
I just threw this together, and while doing it I came up with a quite easy way to create discs with holes, and cones. Consider two edge.dat's same orientation, same position but with different diameters. If one where to fill out the space between (...) (25 years ago, 28-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: 6641.dat Technic Changeover Catch
|
|
(...) In my opinion, mock-ups and unofficial parts as just that: unofficial. People using them should know that the orientation and origin may change when (if) the parts become official. So I think it is safe to change the orientation of your part (...) (25 years ago, 28-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
