 | | (canceled)
|
|
|
| |
| | (canceled)
|
|
|
| |
| | Re: Unofficial Part: 2500 1x8 Light Bar [DAT]
|
|
Jeff Stembel <Dragonelf1@aol.com> wrote in message news:FC8rCo.8Ku@lugnet.com... (...) Man! I GOTTA get the "Reply" and "Reply Group" buttons down! ;) Yes, they ARE a mistake, as well as the chrome interior. Here is a revised part for your perusal. (...) (25 years ago, 29-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Portion of Element 30358 [DAT]
|
|
This file is referenced in the message "part question: 30358" in lugnet.cad.dev. 0 Name: 30358box.dat 0 Author: Karim Nassar 0 Unofficial Sub-Part 2 24 10 0 20 -10 0 20 2 24 -10 0 20 -10 0 -20 2 24 -10 0 -20 10 0 -20 2 24 10 0 -20 10 0 20 2 24 10 0 (...) (25 years ago, 29-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Corrected part: 32054 Technic Pin Long with Stop Bush [DAT]
|
|
0 I've corrected the identical vertices problem with this part, and 0 checked it with l3p -check. I'm still holding it for a couple of more 0 days before sending it to Terry K, though, in case someone finds even 0 more errors. Thanks. 0 Technic Pin (...) (25 years ago, 28-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Corrected part: 32039 Technic Connector with Axlehole [DAT]
|
|
0 I've corrected the identical vertices problem with this part, and 0 checked it with l3p -check. I'm still holding it for a couple of more 0 days before sending it to Terry K, though, in case someone finds even 0 more errors. Thanks. 0 Technic (...) (25 years ago, 28-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Mistake in 2-4cyli?
|
|
Hi Steve, I disagree with your reasoning. (...) 2-4cyli.dat's (...) If I use 2-4cyli as the 'edge' of a part, such as a window shutter, then on one side I would have an edge line with an optional line over it, and on the other side I would just have (...) (25 years ago, 28-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
| | Re: [Mock-up] Tie Fighter Windscreen
|
|
thanks for that. i now have most of the important starwars parts (25 years ago, 28-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Mistake in 2-4cyli? [DAT]
|
|
(...) I just looked at the file. It seems to be OK. There's one 1 conditional line for each quad, which is right. Notice that this setup gives a conditional line on one edge of the half-cylinder, but not on the other. With one side edged, and the (...) (25 years ago, 27-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
| | Mistake in 2-4cyli?
|
|
For the Primitives Committee, I think I might have found a mistake in 2-4cyli. It seems there is an optional line missing (or 1 too many). I have worked out an analysis, but I can't figure out how to post it to lugnet. So if someone will send out an (...) (25 years ago, 27-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
